Two “free-range homeboys” create a utopia for our time—and it’s for the birds.
HSU Theatre performs LOS PAJAROS (The Birds), a contemporary musical satire adapted by the Chicano American performance troupe Culture Clash and directed by Dell’Arte’s Michael Fields, for two weekends: Thursdays through Saturdays, February 5-7 and 12-14 at 7:30 p.m., with a 2 p.m. matinee on Saturday February 14 in the Van Duzer Theatre. Tickets are $10 general/$8 students and seniors, with a limited number of free tickets for HSU students at each performance, from the HSU Ticket Office (826-3928) or at the door. Produced by HSU Department of Theatre, Film & Dance.
Archive of pre-production information and photos 2007-2016, Humboldt State University Theatre, Film and Dance Performances in Arcata, California.
Showing posts with label Los Pajaros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Los Pajaros. Show all posts
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Sunday, January 25, 2015
They seem to succeed and everybody’s happy, until a series of farcical and familiar visitors (like President Nixon, a real estate agent, John Lennon, various political activists, the IRS and Mother Teresa) complicate the dream. They set out to be free as birds, but end up mired in old problems and their own weaknesses.
Adapted by Culture Clash from one of the western world’s first great comedies, The Birds by Greek playwright Aristophanes, this brand new production features a professional six-piece band headed by Tim Randles, backing the cast in the blues, salsa, gospel and rock and roll composed by Michael Roth. This HSU production is the first anywhere not performed by Culture Clash.
Sometimes outrageous, this contemporary retelling from a Latino perspective (further updated for today’s audiences) uses satire and slapstick, music and dance, to locate laughter and tragedy in our continuing struggle to reinvent the American Dream.
Sometimes outrageous, this contemporary retelling from a Latino perspective (further updated for today’s audiences) uses satire and slapstick, music and dance, to locate laughter and tragedy in our continuing struggle to reinvent the American Dream.
Los Pajaros: Our Cast
Foxx: Geo Alva
Gato: Ivan Gamboa
Hoopoe: Jesse Chavez
Prokne: Ambar Cuevas
Various Characters and Ensemble:
Ina Loaiza
Christopher Moreno
Camille Borrowdale
Gino Bloomberg
Veronica Brooks
Elio Robles
Mark Teeter
Madison McCormack
Latin Peppers (the band)
Andrew Barnett, Jimmy Durchsiag, Jon Lewis, Orlando Morales, Lee Philips, Tim Randles.
Los Pajaros: Our Production
Director: Michael Fields
Music Director and Sound Design: Tim Randles
Scenic/Projection Design: Heidi Voelker
Costume Design: Marissa Menezes
Properties Design: Marisa Day
Technical Director: Jared Sorenson
Stage Manager: Ellen Martin
Asst. Stage Manager: Elena Kay
Production Manager: Derek Lane
Scenographer/ Lighting Design: Jim McHugh
Asst. Lighting Design: Ian McBride
Asst. Costume Design: Isabella Ceja
Wig Design/Construction: Samantha Silva
Costume Shop Manager: Catherine Brown
Prop Shop Manager: Emma Lubin
Scene Shop Supervisor: Jayson Mohatt
Administrative Support: Lorraine Dillon, Debra Ryerson
Photography: Kellie Brown
Publicity/blog copy & design: Bill Kowinski
Music Director and Sound Design: Tim Randles
Scenic/Projection Design: Heidi Voelker
Costume Design: Marissa Menezes
Properties Design: Marisa Day
Technical Director: Jared Sorenson
Stage Manager: Ellen Martin
Asst. Stage Manager: Elena Kay
Production Manager: Derek Lane
Scenographer/ Lighting Design: Jim McHugh
Asst. Lighting Design: Ian McBride
Asst. Costume Design: Isabella Ceja
Wig Design/Construction: Samantha Silva
Costume Shop Manager: Catherine Brown
Prop Shop Manager: Emma Lubin
Scene Shop Supervisor: Jayson Mohatt
Administrative Support: Lorraine Dillon, Debra Ryerson
Photography: Kellie Brown
Publicity/blog copy & design: Bill Kowinski
Los Pajaros: Our Director
The Culture Clash script of its adaptation of The Birds by Aristophanes includes a prefatory quotation by the art critic Robert Hughes that begins: “Americans are suckers for utopian promises.” Hughes observes that each new generation “will have some other fantasy to chase, its approaches equally lined with entrepreneurs and flacks, who will be its main beneficiaries.”
Michael Fields is producing artistic director of the Dell’Arte Company and director of the California Summer School of the Arts as well as director of this HSU production. He referred to the Hughes quotation in explaining that it is a “very pointed adaptation. It’s about two guys who are legitimately searching for a better life, but they end up re-creating the same kind of world they set out to escape.”
Culture Clash updated the ancient Greek play in 1998 and gave it a contemporary urban Latino perspective. Fields took this process a step further by changing the play’s title, from English (The Birds) to Spanish (Los Pajaros.)
“Language is culture,” Fields said. “We want to be true to the perspective of the main characters. I talked with members of Culture Clash and they’re fine with the title change. They also gave us permission to change whatever we needed to change to make it contemporary.”
Fields had the collaboration of his largely bilingual cast to decide what to change in the script, especially for a 2015 audience. “It’s like commedia that way,” he said. “You have to keep it on the edge of what’s current, which is what Aristophanes did for his time.”
“For example, there’s a line—‘older than Dick Clark.’ Dick Clark is dead now so we needed somebody else. The cast suggested Betty White.”
Fields also discovered references that didn’t need to be changed. “I was thinking of substituting somebody else for President Nixon, but they said he’s a character on Cartoon Network, so everybody still knows about him.”
But the basic story remains, from ancient Greece to now. “It’s the vacuous quest for utopia,” Fields said. “The idea that if only we had this or that, then everything would be perfect.”
In this version there’s an unhappy ending. “It’s pretty brutal,” Fields said.
But that isn’t the only element that may shock people. “Structurally this is a farce, but it has a lot of flat-out satire, which Culture Clash designed to be very topical and intentionally provocative,” Fields said. “Some people are probably going to be offended, but the satire and the stereotypes are spread out evenly. Everybody is a target.”
Along the way there are jokes, physical humor, outrageous costumes, projections and scenic elements that remain secret, as well as dancing and music. Lots of music.
“The music is really great,” Fields said, “and in many different styles—including salsa, blues, gospel, rock & roll. Thanks to an HSU diversity grant we’ve got a live band of professional musicians, led by Tim Randles. The cast does a lot of singing that keeps the story moving.”
Michael Fields is producing artistic director of the Dell’Arte Company and director of the California Summer School of the Arts as well as director of this HSU production. He referred to the Hughes quotation in explaining that it is a “very pointed adaptation. It’s about two guys who are legitimately searching for a better life, but they end up re-creating the same kind of world they set out to escape.”
Culture Clash updated the ancient Greek play in 1998 and gave it a contemporary urban Latino perspective. Fields took this process a step further by changing the play’s title, from English (The Birds) to Spanish (Los Pajaros.)
“Language is culture,” Fields said. “We want to be true to the perspective of the main characters. I talked with members of Culture Clash and they’re fine with the title change. They also gave us permission to change whatever we needed to change to make it contemporary.”
Fields had the collaboration of his largely bilingual cast to decide what to change in the script, especially for a 2015 audience. “It’s like commedia that way,” he said. “You have to keep it on the edge of what’s current, which is what Aristophanes did for his time.”
“For example, there’s a line—‘older than Dick Clark.’ Dick Clark is dead now so we needed somebody else. The cast suggested Betty White.”
Fields also discovered references that didn’t need to be changed. “I was thinking of substituting somebody else for President Nixon, but they said he’s a character on Cartoon Network, so everybody still knows about him.”
But the basic story remains, from ancient Greece to now. “It’s the vacuous quest for utopia,” Fields said. “The idea that if only we had this or that, then everything would be perfect.”
In this version there’s an unhappy ending. “It’s pretty brutal,” Fields said.
But that isn’t the only element that may shock people. “Structurally this is a farce, but it has a lot of flat-out satire, which Culture Clash designed to be very topical and intentionally provocative,” Fields said. “Some people are probably going to be offended, but the satire and the stereotypes are spread out evenly. Everybody is a target.”
Along the way there are jokes, physical humor, outrageous costumes, projections and scenic elements that remain secret, as well as dancing and music. Lots of music.
“The music is really great,” Fields said, “and in many different styles—including salsa, blues, gospel, rock & roll. Thanks to an HSU diversity grant we’ve got a live band of professional musicians, led by Tim Randles. The cast does a lot of singing that keeps the story moving.”
Los Pajaros: Culture Clash
This adaptation of The Birds by Aristophanes was created by John Glore with Culture Clash, with music composed by Michael Roth. It was produced at South Coast Repertory and Berkeley Repertory in early 1998.
The show began at South Coast Rep, which requested a Culture Clash confrontation with a classic. At first they did the Aristophanes script, then developed their own in a series of workshops. "We worked from a multicultural perspective," Glore said, "and somewhere along the line we decided that the Greek chorus should sing songs, so the composer Michael Roth was brought in. We've avoided calling this adaptation of The Birds a musical, but it is musical in nature."
The HSU production is the first time an ensemble other than Culture Clash has performed their script of this play. Director Michael Fields consulted with composer Michael Roth on the music, and with members of Culture Clash, who gave their permission to update contemporary references, and to change the title to Los Pajaros.
According to their archival site at California State University Northridge: "Culture Clash is Richard Montoya, Ric Salinas and Herbert Siguenza. The Latino/Chicano comedy and theatre group was born on Cinco de Mayo, 1984 at René Yáñez's Galeria de la Raza in San Francisco, California. Originally composed of six members, this innovative troupe gained a place in the national spotlight with their 1988 play, The Mission.
Counting influences such as Charlie Chaplin, Bertolt Brecht, Cantinflas, and the Marx Brothers, Culture Clash have brought their blend of social and political satire to prominent venues including New York's Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Miami's Colony Theatre, and Los Angeles' Mark Taper Forum; to their television specials and comedy series; to their movies and short films; to their artwork and visual style; and most recently, to the publication of their collected works--Culture Clash: Life, Death and Revolutionary Comedy (1998) and Culture Clash in AmeriCCa: Four Plays (2003)."
In 2007 Culture Clash did their updated version of The Birds as an "elaborate readers theatre" piece at the Getty Center in LA. In 2009 they did their version of another Aristophanes play, Peace, also at the Getty Center.
The show began at South Coast Rep, which requested a Culture Clash confrontation with a classic. At first they did the Aristophanes script, then developed their own in a series of workshops. "We worked from a multicultural perspective," Glore said, "and somewhere along the line we decided that the Greek chorus should sing songs, so the composer Michael Roth was brought in. We've avoided calling this adaptation of The Birds a musical, but it is musical in nature."
The HSU production is the first time an ensemble other than Culture Clash has performed their script of this play. Director Michael Fields consulted with composer Michael Roth on the music, and with members of Culture Clash, who gave their permission to update contemporary references, and to change the title to Los Pajaros.
According to their archival site at California State University Northridge: "Culture Clash is Richard Montoya, Ric Salinas and Herbert Siguenza. The Latino/Chicano comedy and theatre group was born on Cinco de Mayo, 1984 at René Yáñez's Galeria de la Raza in San Francisco, California. Originally composed of six members, this innovative troupe gained a place in the national spotlight with their 1988 play, The Mission.
Counting influences such as Charlie Chaplin, Bertolt Brecht, Cantinflas, and the Marx Brothers, Culture Clash have brought their blend of social and political satire to prominent venues including New York's Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, Miami's Colony Theatre, and Los Angeles' Mark Taper Forum; to their television specials and comedy series; to their movies and short films; to their artwork and visual style; and most recently, to the publication of their collected works--Culture Clash: Life, Death and Revolutionary Comedy (1998) and Culture Clash in AmeriCCa: Four Plays (2003)."
In 2007 Culture Clash did their updated version of The Birds as an "elaborate readers theatre" piece at the Getty Center in LA. In 2009 they did their version of another Aristophanes play, Peace, also at the Getty Center.
Los Pajaros: Aristophanes and Old Comedy
Most HSU students today have lived much of their lives with the US at war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Aristophanes was around 14 when Athens first engaged Sparta and its allies in the Peloponnesian War, which lasted for a quarter century. When it began, Athens was an imperial power, fighting to hold on to its empire and then extend it. When the war ended, Athens was an impoverished and subjugated state, and its years of cultural as well as economic and political glory were over.
Aristophanes is believed to have written some 40 plays, though only 11 survive. Many express his antiwar sentiments and opposition to the imperial ambitions of the Peloponnesian War, particularly to war profiteering.
His comedies target political and military figures, and other prominent people of his time, including fellow playwright Euripides and the philosopher Socrates (who was amused by the caricature, but his disciples were upset, especially Plato.) He was a controversial and sometimes feared critic of Athenian society.
Theatre as we know it was born on the Greek stage in this era. Tragedy was the predominant form at the festivals where plays were presented, and after a series of such tragedies, a comedy was the classic definition of comic relief. Aristophanes is the major proponent of comedy whose plays survived. His work defines comedy as it changed during and after his lifetime.
Scholars divide this period into Old, Middle and New Comedy. Women in Congress by Aristophanes (presented last year at North Coast Repertory Theatre) is Middle Comedy, with less pointed caricature of known figures. It’s a little closer to the story-dominated comedies of our age, which developed from New Comedy through the Romans and branched off into everything from commedia dell’arte to situation comedy.
The Birds however is Old Comedy. The story is less prominent. Old Comedy is closer to the bawdy fertility revels and rituals in honor of the god Dionysus, which are believed to be a major source of both comedy and tragedy. Old Comedy was highly musical.
But even with less of a story in our sense, there was a set form to Old Comedy. There was a prologue spoken to the audience (parados), a staged debate (the agon) and the chorus addressing the audience (parabasis.)
In between there were episodes we recognize as story, though there is less development of a complete beginning, middle and end. In our terms, Old Comedy combined sketch comedy, farce, political satire, physical comedy, rude stand-up and the kind of bragging to the audience that boxers and wrestlers engage in before matches.
Many of these elements of Old Comedy are preserved in this Culture Clash adaptation, including addressing the audience and lots of music. But it has more of a story shape, and while not quite a black comedy, it has elements of classical tragedy and no happy ending. Within its southern California urban Latino milieu, stylistically it might be thought of as Saturday Night Live meets Duck Soup and Doctor Strangelove.
Aristophanes is believed to have written some 40 plays, though only 11 survive. Many express his antiwar sentiments and opposition to the imperial ambitions of the Peloponnesian War, particularly to war profiteering.
His comedies target political and military figures, and other prominent people of his time, including fellow playwright Euripides and the philosopher Socrates (who was amused by the caricature, but his disciples were upset, especially Plato.) He was a controversial and sometimes feared critic of Athenian society.
Theatre as we know it was born on the Greek stage in this era. Tragedy was the predominant form at the festivals where plays were presented, and after a series of such tragedies, a comedy was the classic definition of comic relief. Aristophanes is the major proponent of comedy whose plays survived. His work defines comedy as it changed during and after his lifetime.
Scholars divide this period into Old, Middle and New Comedy. Women in Congress by Aristophanes (presented last year at North Coast Repertory Theatre) is Middle Comedy, with less pointed caricature of known figures. It’s a little closer to the story-dominated comedies of our age, which developed from New Comedy through the Romans and branched off into everything from commedia dell’arte to situation comedy.
The Birds however is Old Comedy. The story is less prominent. Old Comedy is closer to the bawdy fertility revels and rituals in honor of the god Dionysus, which are believed to be a major source of both comedy and tragedy. Old Comedy was highly musical.
But even with less of a story in our sense, there was a set form to Old Comedy. There was a prologue spoken to the audience (parados), a staged debate (the agon) and the chorus addressing the audience (parabasis.)
In between there were episodes we recognize as story, though there is less development of a complete beginning, middle and end. In our terms, Old Comedy combined sketch comedy, farce, political satire, physical comedy, rude stand-up and the kind of bragging to the audience that boxers and wrestlers engage in before matches.
Many of these elements of Old Comedy are preserved in this Culture Clash adaptation, including addressing the audience and lots of music. But it has more of a story shape, and while not quite a black comedy, it has elements of classical tragedy and no happy ending. Within its southern California urban Latino milieu, stylistically it might be thought of as Saturday Night Live meets Duck Soup and Doctor Strangelove.
Los Pajaros: Utopia Parkway
The Birds provides a name often used to sum up the wishful fantasy of utopian dreams: “Cloud Cuckooland.” But even though utopia is a Greek word, it doesn’t appear in Aristophanes. The elaborated idea of an ideal or at least a better society enters Western literature with Plato, but it was the Englishman Sir Thomas More who gave it this familiar name in the 16th century. His book is called Utopia (which means “no place”) but in it, the fictional society he describes is also called eutopia (the good place.)
Utopian tales have been told for centuries. More recently, an opposite sort of story has predominated, called the anti-utopia or dystopia. It often takes features of contemporary society to their extreme logical conclusions to demonstrate possible consequences of today. The Hunger Games series of novels and films form a prominent contemporary example, but there are many others.
So in these terms, is Aristophanes describing a utopia or a dystopia in his play The Birds? Scholars gathered in San Francisco in 1990—about eight years before Culture Clash produced their version—to discuss this question (among others.) The traditional utopian view was seriously challenged by those who consider it dystopian. One scholar called The Birds a classical precursor to George Orwell’s The Animal Farm. Another points out distinct differences between Aristophanes and Plato's utopia in The Republic (Apparently the two didn't like each other.)
Since then the anti-utopian view predominates. But there's still scholarly division on this point--maybe it's basically utopian.
Still, the two wanderers at the beginning of The Birds are definitely looking for a society more to their liking. The walled city in the sky built by the birds (Cloud Cukooland) isn't an impossible dream: it successfully forces the gods to bow to its power. But there are many complications.
Yet Aristophanes The Birds has what would become the classic happy ending of comedies: a wedding (or in this case, preparation for a wedding.) The violent ending of the Culture Clash version however is very different. And partly for that reason, it has a clearer sense of utopia sought but dystopia found, or created.
There is a strain in American thought and writing that supports this sense of what HSU production director Michael Fields called “a vacuous quest for Utopia” by those who unconsciously “ end up re-creating the same kind of world they set out to escape.”
Historian Frederick Jackson Turner proposed a now- famous thesis that the American character was forged by confronting and conquering the western frontier. Others however have pointed out that the frontier was a movable dream that eventually became the same old nightmare.
As civilization moved west, new settlers dreamed of building a different and better place just beyond the latest frontier, only to eventually replicate nearly all that they left. The dream of an American utopia beyond the next frontier ended in California, which was, as the poet Lew Welsh wrote “the last place/There is no place left for us to go.” (At least until there was Alaska and Hawaii.)
But there were still spaces between the cities, and the utopian dream was transferred to suburbia, which one writer called “the crabgrass frontier.”
On Long Island from New York City, in an ever-widening concentric circle around Chicago, all along the new freeways in southern California, and most everywhere else in America, suburbia sprouted in the 1950s and 1960s. That these were to be utopian alternatives to the city was an explicit promise, most vividly preserved in one of the new highways built expressly as express lanes carrying commuters from New York to suburbia: the Utopia Parkway.
But the highways themselves were immediately overcome by reality. Noting that “expressways opened in 1952 were by 1955 carrying the traffic load that had been forecast for 1985,” author Robert Caro observed that these highways, “of dimensions literally unknown in history, could be opened one month—and be filled to absolute capacity the next.”
The fateful irony can be summarized in one story: in the early 20th century, doctors on the U.S. East Coast and Midwest sometimes advised severe sufferers of hay fever and other related allergies to head for Arizona, where the air was clear and dry, and hay fever was pretty much unknown. Over the subsequent decades many took that advice, but once there, settlers planted the familiar trees and grass that were the sources of these allergies. By the late 20th century, Arizona had the highest incidence of hay fever and related allergies in the country.
Fictionally, the unconscious habit of polluting utopia was extended to “the final frontier” by various science fiction writers, notably Ray Bradbury in The Martian Chronicles.
Utopia has often been ridiculed as naive fantasy, as the name Cloud Cukooland now implies. But the notion of creating a utopia became suspect in itself in the 20th century due to the utopian pronouncements and horrific consequences in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, China in the Cultural Revolution, and Cambodia under the Kymer Rouge. The temptations of attaining power is an important theme in The Birds, reflecting Athenian imperialism. It is even more explicit in the Culture Clash adaptation.
But even though utopia has possibly its worst press in history today, some contemporaries (including science fiction writers like Kim Stanley Robinson) still insist on the need to imagine utopias in which humanity consciously confronts its current problems, including those self-delusions that turn utopias into dystopias. They are needed partly to provide models of a better future, and partly to provide the hope that might motivate attempts to work towards it. Even creators of dystopias are warning against thoughtless acceptance of new technologies and old patterns of behavior.
It’s become a feature of our age that due to the immense power of technology as well as its cost to the natural environment, our civilization may well be left with only two choices. They are, in the words of Buckminster Fuller, utopia or oblivion.
Utopian tales have been told for centuries. More recently, an opposite sort of story has predominated, called the anti-utopia or dystopia. It often takes features of contemporary society to their extreme logical conclusions to demonstrate possible consequences of today. The Hunger Games series of novels and films form a prominent contemporary example, but there are many others.
So in these terms, is Aristophanes describing a utopia or a dystopia in his play The Birds? Scholars gathered in San Francisco in 1990—about eight years before Culture Clash produced their version—to discuss this question (among others.) The traditional utopian view was seriously challenged by those who consider it dystopian. One scholar called The Birds a classical precursor to George Orwell’s The Animal Farm. Another points out distinct differences between Aristophanes and Plato's utopia in The Republic (Apparently the two didn't like each other.)
Since then the anti-utopian view predominates. But there's still scholarly division on this point--maybe it's basically utopian.
Still, the two wanderers at the beginning of The Birds are definitely looking for a society more to their liking. The walled city in the sky built by the birds (Cloud Cukooland) isn't an impossible dream: it successfully forces the gods to bow to its power. But there are many complications.
Yet Aristophanes The Birds has what would become the classic happy ending of comedies: a wedding (or in this case, preparation for a wedding.) The violent ending of the Culture Clash version however is very different. And partly for that reason, it has a clearer sense of utopia sought but dystopia found, or created.
Historian Frederick Jackson Turner proposed a now- famous thesis that the American character was forged by confronting and conquering the western frontier. Others however have pointed out that the frontier was a movable dream that eventually became the same old nightmare.
As civilization moved west, new settlers dreamed of building a different and better place just beyond the latest frontier, only to eventually replicate nearly all that they left. The dream of an American utopia beyond the next frontier ended in California, which was, as the poet Lew Welsh wrote “the last place/There is no place left for us to go.” (At least until there was Alaska and Hawaii.)
On Long Island from New York City, in an ever-widening concentric circle around Chicago, all along the new freeways in southern California, and most everywhere else in America, suburbia sprouted in the 1950s and 1960s. That these were to be utopian alternatives to the city was an explicit promise, most vividly preserved in one of the new highways built expressly as express lanes carrying commuters from New York to suburbia: the Utopia Parkway.
But the highways themselves were immediately overcome by reality. Noting that “expressways opened in 1952 were by 1955 carrying the traffic load that had been forecast for 1985,” author Robert Caro observed that these highways, “of dimensions literally unknown in history, could be opened one month—and be filled to absolute capacity the next.”
![]() |
Suburbia by David Shankbone |
Fictionally, the unconscious habit of polluting utopia was extended to “the final frontier” by various science fiction writers, notably Ray Bradbury in The Martian Chronicles.
Utopia has often been ridiculed as naive fantasy, as the name Cloud Cukooland now implies. But the notion of creating a utopia became suspect in itself in the 20th century due to the utopian pronouncements and horrific consequences in Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union, China in the Cultural Revolution, and Cambodia under the Kymer Rouge. The temptations of attaining power is an important theme in The Birds, reflecting Athenian imperialism. It is even more explicit in the Culture Clash adaptation.
But even though utopia has possibly its worst press in history today, some contemporaries (including science fiction writers like Kim Stanley Robinson) still insist on the need to imagine utopias in which humanity consciously confronts its current problems, including those self-delusions that turn utopias into dystopias. They are needed partly to provide models of a better future, and partly to provide the hope that might motivate attempts to work towards it. Even creators of dystopias are warning against thoughtless acceptance of new technologies and old patterns of behavior.
It’s become a feature of our age that due to the immense power of technology as well as its cost to the natural environment, our civilization may well be left with only two choices. They are, in the words of Buckminster Fuller, utopia or oblivion.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)